Discussion: Malaysian Universities pushing for rankings – right or wrong strategy?
Read the article by TheStar here.
And although this is a sore point for some, UM deputy vice-chancellor (Development) Prof Dr Kurunathan Ratnavelu (who carried out the analysis of UM’s staff productivity) says the new policies embrace meritocracy and it is the first time such a benchmarking style has been implemented.
A medical lecturer points out that academia is more than just publishing in journals.
“One’s ability in stimulating intellectual discussion and mentoring students should be taken into account, just as one’s expertise in the field as well as the quality of coaching,” he says..
“A doctor’s main concern is patient care, so we focus on clinical research that will benefit professionals in the treatment of patients.
“The gestation period for such research can easily be six years; how is it then possible to produce multiple high impact papers every year?” she says.
She adds that locally relevant research will fall by the wayside if the focus is “to pursue the goal of ISI journal publication alone”.
“For example, something that doctors really need now is measuring cancer prevalence in Malaysia and it takes a lot of time to do so.
“But at the end of it, this is not going to be published in an ISI journal because the information is only relevant for Malaysia,” she says.
What is your opinion? UM is still lagging behind Thai and Singaporean universities in terms of publication. Do you agree with Prof Ghauth Jasmon’s policy? Western universities are putting a lot of emphasis on publications. Will it work for Malaysian universities?
Discuss this issue in our discussion forum:
Registration is required to take part in our discussion forum. Signing up is free – click here for the application form.
Photo credit: [email protected]